Monday, August 31, 2009
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Here's their advice on "How to start each day with a positive outlook"?
- Open a new file in your computer.
- Name it 'Barack Obama'.
- Send it to the Recycle Bin.
- Empty the Recycle Bin.
- Your PC will ask you: 'Do you really want to get rid of 'Barack Obama?'
- Firmly Click 'Yes.'
- Feel better?
SLICK.com does have a page of Obama Jokes with this preamble:
People have been making fun of presidents from the beginning. However, if you make a joke about Obama, the Left labels you a "hater" or "racist." Well, we're not haters or racists, but we do pride ourselves on being politically incorrect! We are publishing these jokes in the hope that you will get a laugh or two! Feel free to take any or all and spread them around.So in respond I took one of their jokes and made some modification from my perspective. Here it is:
Nancy Pelosi, Harry Raid, and Barack Obama were having a secret caucus on a boat in the middle of the ocean, the weather was nice and calm, but along comes an extemporaneous freaque wave out of nowhere that rocked and capsized their boat. Coast Guard budget has been severly cut to support ACORN, there is no rescuer in sight, who would be saved?God bless America!
... United States of America!
Friday, August 28, 2009
Now having said all the above, to more or less explain why I have been posting Glenn Beck clips in the last few days. I still like to show the following video clips from last night. Beck asked those reasonable questions for us Americans. Don't these unanswered questions from the "transparent" Obama presidency bother you? If not and you are still somehow reading this blog, you are definitely in the wrong place, please go somewhere else.
Five months ago, the great one, Mark Levin, asked the same question on his radio program:
About the same time frame as Levin, this blog "If I am Tryly Free . . . " also looked into this case as a private citizen and asked the same question and did some useful research of her own with this powerful comment:
As it stands now, the voting majority of this country is being played, because they elevated race and political correctness, above all common sense, morality and practical judgement, and the rest of us are being dragged right along with them under the leadership of the man they call "Mr. President."I am sure there are plenty of others also asking. American has a right to know! We just have to ask the question again and again until we are satisfied with the answer. Is that too much to ask?
Here's my question: Do Americans know what is going on in the country right now?
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Jonathan's full article is here. The following table is very educational, because it's the translation of words I have heard and read in the news but have not the slightest idea on what in the world do they really meant.
Ah-ha! That's all clear now: "sliding scale" means free; "public option" is really government take over; "regulation" sounds bad -- it's rules; and "choice of private and public plans" is in fact coverage for illegal aliens.
Well, those petty elites think they can play the hocus-pocus in words to fool people, American people just too smart to fall for those trickeries. So Chairman BO of the granny-killing death panelis already resigned that he will likely to be another Jimmy Carter with one-term and out as the Whitehouse is starting hiss hiss about it. But Americans will be rejoiced to have our country back!
Are you inspired? Hey, this is America, Our America, where everyone is entitled to pursue his or her American dream. But if the guy is aimed at destroy our America system, turn it into a Marxist one, then it is our sacred DUTY to STOP him!
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Well, here's the daily PAI today, 08/23/2009:
I guess when a wee guy's wee thing is weed, he is just truly all wee-weed up!
Saturday, August 22, 2009
This congressman was initially decided not to have any Town Hall meeting. I guess he changed his mind because Lou Dobbs and others are compiling a Hall of Shame to publicize those chicken politicians. He is a shameful politician nevertheless, but we'll give him some credit for this video.
Here's a folow-up as he called the Great One: from the Mark Levin show.
I do feel strongly that the United States of America, under God, is most certainly not ready to be readily ran over by a bunch of leftest, Marxist thugs. American people are waking up at just the right time now. So free fall is the non-stoppable historical development to reaffirm the self-evident truth that our unalienable rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness endowed by the Creator, no petty thugs can take them away from us by any means.
I don't think President Obama will stop his freefall for a while for a variety of reasons, but most telling is that the proposed medicines are worse than the raging disease. He is losing large slices of independents, moderate Republicans, and conservative Democrats who fear his polarizing attempts to transform America. At precisely the same time, his left-wing base is hectoring him to get even more self-destructively statist — as if proposed record tax hikes, corporate and bank takeovers, socialized medicine, cap and trade, race/class/gender agenda appointments, serial apologies abroad, and a $2 trillion annual deficit just didn't cut it.
Worse still, his base is now arguing for him to get more partisan, get meaner, get angrier, and get more fired up — also at precisely the time that polls suggest he is falling for already doing just that — and losing his once bipartisan, no-more-red/no-more-blue-state supposed transcendence.
In truth, as partisans tell Obama to get nasty, his rhetoric the last 90 days has already been exclusively polarizing. The administration and its supporters have ridiculed tea-parties, town-hallers, Republican skepticism about deficits, etc. — evoking everything from Brooks Brothers to the Nazis, from being un-Christian to now getting "wee-weed up."
Already, at eight months, the president is at a Clinton 1995 gut-check moment, but seems to have preferred instead the self-righteous, contrite, and hectoring Jimmy Carter solution.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Have you seen this picture before? If you have and it does not bother you then you should not be here reading this blog. I had never seen or heard about it before. I can not deny that I am ignorant and unenlightened, but now that I have just learned about this Fabian Window from reading this and this articles, I am genuinely frightened.
From my ignorance I only know George Bernard Shaw as a famous writer, may be sometimes humorous and satirical, but I did not know that he was a founding member of this Fabian Socialist Society, designed this Fabian window, and said this:
"Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well."Even that might be just regarded as humorous and satirical, but I know he is really not kidding when I notice the following from Fabian Society's official website:
As we approach the one year anniversary of President Obama's electoral victory, the Fabians plan to use this moment to hold a major half-day conference to discuss how we can create a progressive movement for change in Europe. The event will take place on Saturday 7 November 2009 ; speakers include the Foreign Secretary David Miliband MP; former Clinton White House Deputy Press Secretary Jennifer Palmieri; outgoing European Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs Joaquin Aluminia; European Commissioner for Trade Baroness Catherine Ashton and former Prime Minister of Denmark and current PES President Poul Nyrup Rasmussen.
Why would a foreign group celebrate the one year anniversary of the election of an American president?
Now that everything alluded in William Kebin Stoos' article become clearly elucidated and make clear sense to interpret what we are confronting right now and that is downright frightening!
It was NOT an ordinary presidential election American people had last November. Little did we know that the 52.7% winner, while continued screaming "I win" all these time, took the election and turning it into a very big hammer and using the hammer to remould the country in the last eight month in ways we could never imagined as Mr. Stoos indicated. Americans, it's time to wake up now, and it's time to take that hammer away before it's too late. Can we do it in 2010? YES, WE CAN!
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
I offer this radio segment from the Great One, Mark Levin, which I came across recently, for your entertenment:
I can assure all these sounds also have video clips, so they are all true, you can't make these things up. If you are a Koolaid drinker, nothing can convince you otherwise. One of my colleagues still argues that he is still better than George Bush. Hey, George Bush is out of the picture now, how can the country going to get through the next 3 years?
This amazing interview was done back in 1985 with a former KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to. It's shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.I don't know how many American ever heard this video back in 1985 and over the years since. I didn't. But I think it's not too late to become mindful of this. We have seen things happen in front of our own eyes and not really aware of it happening. Now we are in the crisis stage now. Wake up, Americans! Don't let it happen, We want our country back!
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Not so fast, folks, you've been fooled again already!
Read today's Joseph Ashby article in American Thinker -- 'death panel' is not in the bill . . . the panel already exists!
Yeb, it is called the "Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research" in the first bill Obama rushed through in February, the porkulus Stimulus bill (H.R. 1) that many politicians seemed to have voted without reading. The the Council is to empower an unelected bureaucracy to make the hard decisions about health care rationing that elected politicians are politically unable to make. One of the member already on the Council is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, not that many American had ever heard him, but is really the "death doctor" behind Obama's healthcare bill, who as Ashby pointed out had explained the elderly care as "Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years." In other words 65 year old has out-lived his or her usefulness, the priority is to the 25 year old. Is this America?
So even if as claimed the "end of life" provision is dropped, it will always in hazy language aimmed at some of the people some of the time -- that's all they need to get the bill passed. Once it is passed, they can do any interpretation to your disadvantage for certain. As Mr. Murphy might have implied: If it can be interpretated to screw you up, it will!
Friday, August 14, 2009
God bless America!
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
“The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil,”
As a libertarian and refugee from the authoritarian Roman Catholic church of my youth, I simply do not understand the drift of my party toward a soulless collectivism. This is in fact what Sarah Palin hit on in her shocking image of a "death panel" under Obamacare that would make irrevocable decisions about the disabled and elderly. When I first saw that phrase, headlined on the Drudge Report, I burst out laughing. It seemed so over the top! But on reflection, I realized that Palin's shrewdly timed metaphor spoke directly to the electorate's unease with the prospect of shadowy, unelected government figures controlling our lives. A death panel not only has the power of life and death but is itself a symptom of a Kafkaesque brave new world where authority has become remote, arbitrary and spectral. And as in the Spanish Inquisition, dissidence is heresy, persecuted and punished.Wow! How sagacious can she be with words! Why don't everyone of us take the same reflection with Ms Camille and see clearly the shrewdness and truth in Sarah Palin's "death panel" metaphor. Can the people in the center of "soulless collectivism" ever understand the brilliance of Prof. Paglia and listen to her?
Of course justifying Sarah Palin's "death panel" is only a small part of Paglia's article that covers many topics. Here's another great insights I like:
And what do Democrats stand for, if they are so ready to defame concerned citizens as the "mob" -- a word betraying a Marie Antoinette delusion of superiority to ordinary mortals. I thought my party was populist, attentive to the needs and wishes of those outside the power structure. And as a product of the 1960s, I thought the Democratic party was passionately committed to freedom of thought and speech.
But somehow liberals have drifted into a strange servility toward big government, which they revere as a godlike foster father-mother who can dispense all bounty and magically heal all ills. The ethical collapse of the left was nowhere more evident than in the near total silence of liberal media and Web sites at the Obama administration's outrageous solicitation to private citizens to report unacceptable "casual conversations" to the White House. If Republicans had done this, there would have been an angry explosion by Democrats from coast to coast. I was stunned at the failure of liberals to see the blatant totalitarianism in this incident, which the president should have immediately denounced. His failure to do so implicates him in it.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
If you think I am overstating the case, please pay attention to this news report by Chelsea Schilling in Worldnetdaily:
In the last 18 years, highly personal information has been published about presidential candidates, including divorce and alimony details, drunk driving arrest records, college grades, urinalysis results, prostate cancer surgery – even details about George W. Bush's hemorrhoid troubles.Just what you would expect from regular journalistic works, right? How about this:
The media have dredged up medical, military, college and detailed records for Republican and Democratic Party candidates in at least the last five elections. Candidates were subject to intense scrutiny of their health conditions, academic performance and military careers.
Obama has not released his long-form birth certificate, college transcripts, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records or his adoption records.And no report saw it as their job to ask questions and finding them out. Why? Simple! The media in our country right now is totally biased -- they all happily and willingly be taking orders from the White House. No one should have anything to hide, not even secret anti-terrorist documents. Except when it comes to Barack Obama or Barry Soetoro then everything is out of the limit. That's the law of the land in 2009. Where is the outrage, America?
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Saturday, August 8, 2009
An American hero, Kenneth Gladney, who was attacked and beaten at the Russ Carnahan town hall by the representatives union supporters, attended the rally against violence today at the SEIU headquarters in St. Louis.
Kenneth's attorney David Brown read a letter by Kenneth to the crowd since Kenneth was still weak to speak publically.
Friday, August 7, 2009
Why won’t President Obama give the nation that elected him a verifying look at the original “long-form” version of his birth certificate?The title of the article, "A curious lack of curiosity", is super also. So the question American people deserve an answer in 2009 is really what is that something Obama has to hide?
It’s important to grasp the weird fact that this simple request — requiring nothing more than a nod of the presidential head — ranks as fightin’ words to American journalists.
But why not insist on access to the one piece of evidence that could lay the “natural born” citizen issue to rest once and for all?
The media have made their aversion to proof perversely clear: Whatever Obama does, their jarringly unified message is that he certainly should not direct the state of Hawaii to make public his original, long-form birth certificate.
A presidential directive would instantly dispense with the divisive question of whether President Obama’s still-secret, long-form birth certificate contains compromising information.
The entire controversy would disappear forever if there were nothing more sensational on that document than the name of the Hawaiian hospital where baby Barack came into the world.
Such mundane info is the kind of thing that’s missing from the Internet images of the short-form Certification of Live Birth that the Obama campaign made available in 2008 online.
This ironically is the Web-projected imagery that the mainstream media have unquestioningly relied on, even as they have imperiously dismissed all questions regarding its veracity and provenance as “Internet-fueled rumor.”
To be sure, there is corroborating evidence available. Contemporaneous announcements of baby Barack’s arrival in local Hawaiian papers are usually cited as the clincher. But none of it is definitive.
Why won’t the president just give us a look at the original birth certificate and be done with it?
This is the mystery behind the unease “out there,” unease the mainstream media are now simultaneously picking up on even as they try to squelch it.
And this is true particularly after CNN’s Lou Dobbs raised the issue. Dobbs trusts that Obama is in fact a natural-born citizen, he says. But he adds he would like the president to verify his status regardless.
And why not? The Constitution does insist, after all, that a United States president must be a natural-born citizen of the country.
So why won’t this president — who promised the American people an unprecedented level of transparency — reveal his original long-form birth certificate?
Unheeded, the “natural born” controversy will roil indefinitely, further stirred by Hawaiian law (Section 338-17.8, titled “Certificates for children born out of State”), which makes state birth documentation available to children born out of state, even born out of the country.
None of this is healthy. Not the president’s suspicious secrecy. Not the media’s protective absence of curiosity.
It almost makes it seem as if someone might have something to hide.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
I found the above picture from Atlas Shrugs today. As a retired person, I think the message is loud and clear. Here's what I am getting from the current health care brouhaha: Obama encourages ending the life before you were born, he wishes for you to end your life when you are getting old, and in between he'll do anything to tax you to death. He ain't American. He was not born an American. He apologizes for American for no reason. He hates the U.S. Constitution because in there it spells out clearly that he is not qualified to be American President. He fooled 52.7 % of the voters to con his way to where he is. And he rushes to ruin America that took generations of Americans 233 years to build. How can Americans still tolerate him?
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
But I first saw it at Altas Shrugs (who credits to Tammy Bruce) as:
In case anyone should be outraged by this, please recall this Vanity Fair master piece a year ago (Hat tip: Anchoress):
Were you outraged then? Neither should you be outraged now. That's the freedom of expression of our Blessed U.S.A guaranteed by our Constitution. It does not reflect our best by any means. But if Vanity Fair can have it, so does everyone else in U.S.A. Bush did not, and could not, hide anything. Hey, what and how much is Obama hiding right now?
Here's a news reported in Wired.com today which is by no means right-wing:
The article, by John Scott Lewinski, is titled "Joker-ized Obama Image Appears Around L.A." So it is not an isolated instance, it is appeared "Around L.A." So after 6 months of Obama, Americans are really waking up. This is America! Dash Obama's hope and change, Yes we can!
In a play out of the anti-Bush, counterculture playbook, someone or some organization has transformed an image of President Obama into a parody of The Joker from last summer’s The Dark Knight and plastered the poster around Los Angeles.
Supporters of the president call the image — which brands Obama a “socialist” — ugly, mean-spirited and disrespectful to the office of the president. But those opposing White House policies (or just embracing freedom of expression) point out that the same folks backing Obama now had no problem with images depicting President Bush as a vampire a few years ago.
Right or left, political outrage is usually very selective. But this is a surprisingly hip strategy by Obama opponents when you consider how easily the “hope and change” mass media campaign crushed John McCain in 2008.
Sunday, August 2, 2009
which appears to be an official Birth Certificate from Coast General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya for a Male with Christian Name of Barack Hussein II, born on 4th August, 1961.
Now compare it with this one that everyone should recognize it as the "official" one and no one should stupid enough to question it:
How interesting, same date, same father and mother, same given name, but this one was born half way across the globe in Honolulu, State of Hawaii. No hospital name, could be born at his home or on the street or whatever. Clearly the State of Hawaii couldn't care less. Do they always issue this kind of official document with no official seal, no official signature? Welcome to the State of Hawaii, Aloha!
By the way, one more thing, the Kenya document was typed from a real typewriter. Yes, that's the only thing they have in 1961 in Kenya. But the State of Hawaii is obviously much, much more advanced in 1961. They even had the Arial kind of font in their 1961 system to produce the above COLB. I assume it was produced in 1961 since it was registered on August 8, 1961! Strange, it took 4 days in Hawaii but Kenya registration was the next day. Why? Here's another question for old timers: Was it a common thing in 1961 to identify "African" as a race? Aha, the plot thickens.
Well where ever he was born, being only two days away, a happy birthday is in order:
That was unquestionably an authentic 1962 thing!
Here are some very powerful must-hear relevant videos Americans are generally not being informed of their existence:
Update August 11, 2009:
Here's the latest about the aftermath of the discovery of the Kenya Birth Certificate:
Attempt to debunk Obama's Kenyan birth certificate debunked.
Saturday, August 1, 2009
This picture is the kind that was well liked by many and disliked or hated by some others. I got it from this American Thinker Blog article by Thomas Lifson. It appears that this picture is going to be another one of the Obamainian people would consider as what yoy see is not what you think -- along with French girl stare and Obama bow. By the way the Youtube included there had already been removed. Here's another one:
In the Obamania world, that did not happen, of course!